Unregistered User Groups: Anyone Send Email to Volker Mische

Date	Subject		Count	Location
		Re: [Foss4g2013] presentation selection [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	7 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: [Foss4g2013] presentation selection [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	9 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: [Foss4g2013] presentation selection [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	0 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: [Foss4g2013] presentation selection [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	10 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: [Foss4g2013] presentation selection	14 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: Would you be concerned if the "GeoServices REST API" became an OGC standard?	0 replies	OSGeo Discuss
		Re: FOSS4G North America - Blind voting	0 replies	OSGeo Discuss
		Re: Improving public comment period	1 reply	OSGeo Standards
		Re: Improving public comment period	3 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST	0 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] Encodings and REST	0 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST	0 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST	20 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST	1 reply	OSGeo Standards
		Re: [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST	21 replies	OSGeo Standards
		Re: Code sprints at FOSS4G 2013	0 replies	OSGeo Conference Committee
		Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Code sprints at FOSS4G 2013	1 reply	OSGeo Discuss
		Re: FOSS4G presentation review process [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	1 reply	OSGeo Discuss
		Re: FOSS4G presentation review process [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	3 replies	OSGeo Discuss
		Re: FOSS4G presentation review process [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	2 replies	OSGeo Discuss

1234

Powered by Nabble

Edit this page