[gdal-dev] Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[gdal-dev] Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Even Rouault-2
Hi,

This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
(Large File Storage) from
1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
to
50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth

This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
4107.60 USD for Travis-CI

The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be the
proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57

~~~~~~

My vote: +1

Even

[1]
https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage

--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Mateusz Loskot
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 12:49, Even Rouault <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> My vote: +1

+1


p.s. For those who have no experience with LFS and may be wondering,
enabling LFS will only affect *new* files added to storage and any existing
binary or large files will not automatically move from Git storage to Git LFS.
Unless, Git history is rewritten.

Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Howard Butler-3


On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:17 AM Mateusz Loskot <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 12:49, Even Rouault <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> My vote: +1

+1


p.s. For those who have no experience with LFS and may be wondering,
enabling LFS will only affect *new* files added to storage and any existing
binary or large files will not automatically move from Git storage to Git LFS.
Unless, Git history is rewritten.

+1

Howard

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Daniel Morissette
In reply to this post by Even Rouault-2
+1

Daniel


On 2019-10-08 06:49, Even Rouault wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
> 4107.60 USD for Travis-CI
>
> The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be the
> proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57
>
> ~~~~~~
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Even
>
> [1]
> https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage
>


--
Daniel Morissette
Mapgears Inc
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Kurt Schwehr-2
+1 Kurt

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 6:22 AM Daniel Morissette <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

Daniel


On 2019-10-08 06:49, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
> 4107.60 USD for Travis-CI
>
> The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be the
> proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57
>
> ~~~~~~
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Even
>
> [1]
> https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage
>


--
Daniel Morissette
Mapgears Inc
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Frank Warmerdam
In reply to this post by Even Rouault-2

+1 Frank

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:49 AM Even Rouault <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
(Large File Storage) from
1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
to
50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth

This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
4107.60 USD for Travis-CI

The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be the
proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57

~~~~~~

My vote: +1

Even

[1]
https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage

--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, [hidden email]
light and sound - activate the windows |
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

jratike80
In reply to this post by Even Rouault-2
+1

-Jukka-


Even Rouault-2 wrote

> Hi,
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one
> "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
> 4107.60 USD for Travis-CI
>
> The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be
> the
> proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57
>
> ~~~~~~
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Even
>
> [1]
> https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list

> gdal-dev@.osgeo

> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev





--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

Even Rouault-2
In reply to this post by Mateusz Loskot
Hi

This motion is adopted with +1 from PSC members EvenR, ateuszl, HowardB,
DanielM, KurtS, FrankW and JukkaR

Even

> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 12:49, Even Rouault <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> > This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one
> > "data
> > pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> > (Large File Storage) from
> > 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> > to
> > 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
> >
> > My vote: +1
>
> +1
>
>
> p.s. For those who have no experience with LFS and may be wondering,
> enabling LFS will only affect *new* files added to storage and any existing
> binary or large files will not automatically move from Git storage to Git
> LFS. Unless, Git history is rewritten.
>
> Best regards,


--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Motion: spend 60 USD / year for extended GitHub LFS

jmckenna
Administrator
In reply to this post by Even Rouault-2
+1 jeff



On 2019-10-08 7:49 AM, Even Rouault wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This motion is to spend 5 USD/month * 12 = 60 USD annually to buy one "data
> pack" ([1]) to extend the quota of the OSGeo GitHub organization for LFS
> (Large File Storage) from
> 1 GB of storage + 1 GB /month of bandwith
> to
> 50 GB of storage + 50 GB/month of bandwidth
>
> This is within our yearly 5000 USD budget, for which we have already spent
> 4107.60 USD for Travis-CI
>
> The first & main beneficiary of this GitHub LFS extension will actually be the
> proj-datumgrid repository, that has just reached the bandwidth quota:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/proj-datumgrid/issues/57
>
> ~~~~~~
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Even
>
> [1]
> https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-billing-for-git-large-file-storage
>
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev