Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Angelos Tzotsos
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            612-424-9932 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: +1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    612-424-9932 <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Ariel Nunez-2

Thank you Angelos!

On Oct 21, 2016 5:03 AM, "Angelos Tzotsos" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            612-424-9932 <a class="m_-2377409122372249189moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: <a href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" value="+14186965056" target="_blank">+1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="m_-2377409122372249189moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" target="_blank"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    612-424-9932 <a class="m_-2377409122372249189moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel


_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Angelos Tzotsos
In reply to this post by Angelos Tzotsos
Hi all,

I have completed the Release Process part of the Incubation Checklist.
Cameron, can you please review this so we can proceed with a new motion?
Please let me know if we need to add more details.
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

Best regards,
Angelos

On 10/21/2016 01:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would
> like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the
> standards of the incubation committee.
>
> Best,
> Angelos
>
> On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape.
>> I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging
>> GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health
>> community project.
>>
>> However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:
>>
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure 
>>
>>
>> So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the
>> Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).
>>
>> While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added
>> suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
>> While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I
>> suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else
>> worth addressing.
>> In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to
>> the OSGeo code of conduct.
>>
>> On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> You are correct David, twice:
>>> - incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the
>>> issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as
>>> known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help
>>> out or steer clear as appropriate).
>>> - none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check
>>> went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming
>>> with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)
>>>
>>> That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I
>>> am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation
>>> (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to
>>> the code changing ownership).
>>>
>>> It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond
>>> with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner
>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
>>>     went out.
>>>
>>>     The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
>>>     brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
>>>     any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
>>>     bring them up here.
>>>
>>>     Here is the current status on votes:
>>>
>>>       * Bruce Bannerman
>>>       * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
>>>       * Landon Blake +1
>>>       * Howard Butler
>>>       * Arnulf Christl +1
>>>       * Jody Garnett (chair)
>>>       * Dimitris Kotzinos
>>>       * Tom Kralidis +1
>>>       * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
>>>       * Mark Lucas
>>>       * Steve Lime +1
>>>       * Daniel Morissette
>>>       * Markus Schneider
>>>       * Cameron Shorter
>>>       * Jeroen Ticheler
>>>       * Norman Vine
>>>       * Frank Warmerdam
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
>>>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         +1
>>>
>>>         Julien
>>>
>>>         On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:
>>>
>>>             Dear Incubation Committee,
>>>
>>>             As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
>>>             a motion to
>>>             graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
>>>             Jeff Johnson to
>>>             act as the Project Officer.
>>>
>>>             You will find the Incubation Checklist at:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
>>> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>
>>>
>>>             During the incubation process much work has been done to
>>>             solidify the
>>>             intellectual property behind GeoNode.
>>>
>>>               * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved
>>> OpenPlans
>>>               * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
>>>             process
>>>                 created to collect from all contributors
>>>               * all files have been checked for headers
>>>               * the release process documentation has been shored up
>>>
>>>             GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
>>>             developers
>>>             distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
>>>             users have
>>>             developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
>>>             companies that
>>>             have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
>>>             There is no single
>>>             point of failure for this project.
>>>
>>>             The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
>>>             in a way that
>>>             has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
>>>             institutions
>>>             using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
>>>             for GeoNode.
>>>
>>>             Thanks,
>>>
>>>             David
>>>
>>>             --
>>>             ************************************
>>>             David William Bitner
>>>             dbSpatial LLC
>>>             612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Incubator mailing list
>>>             [hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>             http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>         --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
>>>         T: +1 418-696-5056 #202 <tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
>>>         Mapgears
>>>         http://www.mapgears.com/
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Incubator mailing list
>>>         [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     --     ************************************
>>>     David William Bitner
>>>     dbSpatial LLC
>>>     612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Incubator mailing list
>>>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>     <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Incubator mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>
>



--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Angelos Tzotsos
In reply to this post by Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Jody,

So basically we filled in the source file list and went through all the files while making the list.
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Provenance_Review#Source_Files

As you already said, the status looks good, we were able to identify one issue: licensing headers are missing on some js and css files, so we opened a ticket (https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/issues/2348)

The files that you mentioned having copyright from David and myself were packaging files (Debian copyright files and RPM spec files). Those issues were addressed and are already in a pull request (https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/pull/2687).

Regarding the documentation missing CC-SA notice, we modified the conf.py and this will be fixed in the above pull request. Also fixed some po files, good catch.

I hope all is fine now :)

Best regards,
Angelos

On 09/06/2016 05:29 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Checking back today, is the
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Provenance_Review#Source_Files going to
be filled in?  While I have been cheerfully going over the codebase, it is
not really my assurance we are looking for out of the incubation process,
instead this is an opportunity for the project team to double check where
their code (and sample data) came from?


--
Jody Garnett

On 27 August 2016 at 01:33, Jody Garnett [hidden email] wrote:

Since the provenance review was empty I thought I would hit the code
base....

The docs (http://docs.geonode.org/en/latest/index.html)  end up with "©
Copyright 2015, GeoNode Development Team. Revision a5dc49f3" in the footer
(ie they do not indicate they are CCbyA). May be able to update footer in
https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/blob/master/docs/conf.py

Doing spot checks on source code - amusing history updating headers -
thanks Daniel Berry for his own personal edit war. I found a Copyright (C)
2010 David Winslow (not sure if you care).

The "django.po" files have some boiler plate - "# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.,
Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER, This file is distributed
under the same license as the PACKAGE package."
… "


--
Jody Garnett

On 26 August 2016 at 17:01, Jody Garnett [hidden email] wrote:

*Active and healthy community*

No real feedback here, a healthy and diverse group.

*Copyright and License*

A few spot checks on provenance review
<https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Provenance_Review#GeoNode_Provenance_Review>
...

Libraries:
- IMDbPY 4.9? license ... GPLv2
- click 5.1 ... BSD
- matplotlib 1.3.1 ... matplotlib licens <-- is that open source?
- ... a few more to do here?

Source Files - this section is empty?
- um I am missing something? Did you run into any trouble when checking
files ...
- note you do not have to fix things, we only want a list of any trouble
so interested parties can volunteer

Think I will stop here, happy to help at pub this evening or code sprint
tomorrow :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 26 August 2016 at 14:57, Jody Garnett [hidden email] wrote:

Just going through this now because it is so exciting ...

*Open*

For the contribution docs I am not quite sure they are up to date - I
was looking at how the CLA was handled during contributing.
- http://docs.geonode.org/en/latest/organizational/contribut
e/index.html#contrib
- http://docs.geonode.org/en/latest/organizational/contribut
e/review_process.html - broken [[links]]
- https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING looks
good references www.clahub.com, does the link work when doing a pull
request?
- Excellent docs though, and good to credit the github guides.

David do you have links to a PSC decision or two so we can see how it is
done? I am curious as what kind of question would cause the community to
"resort to taking things to the PSC for vote"?

--
Jody Garnett

On 25 August 2016 at 17:28, David William Bitner [hidden email]
wrote:

Dear Incubation Committee,

As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make a motion to
graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with Jeff Johnson to act
as the Project Officer.

You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist

During the incubation process much work has been done to solidify the
intellectual property behind GeoNode.

   - copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
   - a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a process
   created to collect from all contributors
   - all files have been checked for headers
   - the release process documentation has been shored up

GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core developers
distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct users have developed
strong expertise in GeoNode along with many companies that have developed
support programs built around GeoNode. There is no single point of failure
for this project.

The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception in a way
that has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
institutions using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support for
GeoNode.

Thanks,

David

--
************************************
David William Bitner
dbSpatial LLC
612-424-9932

_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



        

      

      

_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Cameron Shorter
In reply to this post by Angelos Tzotsos

Hi all,

I've checked and confirm that the oversight identified in the earlier review has been addressed and I'm now +1 for graduation. Congratulations for a job well done.

Warm regards, Cameron


On 21/10/2016 9:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            612-424-9932 <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: +1 418-696-5056 #202 <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    612-424-9932 <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-- 
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

David William Bitner-3
Thanks Cameron!

Jody, with all positive votes now over a two month period, can we close out this vote?

David

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Cameron Shorter <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi all,

I've checked and confirm that the oversight identified in the earlier review has been addressed and I'm now +1 for graduation. Congratulations for a job well done.

Warm regards, Cameron


On 21/10/2016 9:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_7894567202063161813moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: <a href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" value="+14186965056" target="_blank">+1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="m_7894567202063161813moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" target="_blank"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_7894567202063161813moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-- 
Cameron Shorter
M <a href="tel:%2B61%20419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank">+61 419 142 254



--
************************************
David William Bitner
dbSpatial LLC
612-424-9932

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

jody.garnett
In reply to this post by Angelos Tzotsos
I have returned from travels and would be happy to help if there are any questions. I am aware that I got stuck half way through my review.

--
Jody Garnett

On 21 October 2016 at 03:03, Angelos Tzotsos <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_-5582641056560623720moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: <a href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" value="+14186965056" target="_blank">+1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="m_-5582641056560623720moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" target="_blank"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_-5582641056560623720moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

jody.garnett
In reply to this post by Cameron Shorter
That is great, thanks for checking Cameron.

I am happy to change my vote to a +1. Congrats to the GeoGig team.

--
Jody Garnett

On 24 October 2016 at 12:56, Cameron Shorter <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi all,

I've checked and confirm that the oversight identified in the earlier review has been addressed and I'm now +1 for graduation. Congratulations for a job well done.

Warm regards, Cameron


On 21/10/2016 9:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: <a href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" value="+14186965056" target="_blank">+1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" target="_blank"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-- 
Cameron Shorter
M <a href="tel:%2B61%20419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank">+61 419 142 254

_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

jody.garnett
Grrr ... too many projects with geo in the name - perhaps we should make add that to the graduation checklist.

Congratulations to the GeoNode team; this is especially nice as the project was donated to OSGeo (so it is great that it now meets the expectations we have for our projects).

I am interested, as always, in feedback on incubation - what worked, what did not, what was a surprise, and if we missed anything.

--
Jody Garnett

On 25 October 2016 at 23:09, Jody Garnett <[hidden email]> wrote:
That is great, thanks for checking Cameron.

I am happy to change my vote to a +1. Congrats to the GeoGig team.

--
Jody Garnett

On 24 October 2016 at 12:56, Cameron Shorter <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi all,

I've checked and confirm that the oversight identified in the earlier review has been addressed and I'm now +1 for graduation. Congratulations for a job well done.

Warm regards, Cameron


On 21/10/2016 9:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Hi all,

Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of the incubation committee.

Best,
Angelos

On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
Hi all,

I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.

However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:

https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Release_Procedure

So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).

While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions for a next version of the incubation list here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth addressing.
In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the OSGeo code of conduct.

On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
You are correct David, twice:
- incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as appropriate).
- none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)

That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code changing ownership).

It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)


--
Jody Garnett

On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

    Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
    went out.

    The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
    brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
    any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
    bring them up here.

    Here is the current status on votes:

      * Bruce Bannerman
      * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
      * Landon Blake +1
      * Howard Butler
      * Arnulf Christl +1
      * Jody Garnett (chair)
      * Dimitris Kotzinos
      * Tom Kralidis +1
      * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
      * Mark Lucas
      * Steve Lime +1
      * Daniel Morissette
      * Markus Schneider
      * Cameron Shorter
      * Jeroen Ticheler
      * Norman Vine
      * Frank Warmerdam


    On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
    <[hidden email] [hidden email]> wrote:

        +1

        Julien

        On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:

            Dear Incubation Committee,

            As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
            a motion to
            graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
            Jeff Johnson to
            act as the Project Officer.

            You will find the Incubation Checklist at:

            https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
            <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>

            During the incubation process much work has been done to
            solidify the
            intellectual property behind GeoNode.

              * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved OpenPlans
              * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
            process
                created to collect from all contributors
              * all files have been checked for headers
              * the release process documentation has been shored up

            GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
            developers
            distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
            users have
            developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
            companies that
            have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
            There is no single
            point of failure for this project.

            The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
            in a way that
            has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
            institutions
            using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
            for GeoNode.

            Thanks,

            David

            --
            ************************************
            David William Bitner
            dbSpatial LLC
            <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_-7047382075905815230m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>


            _______________________________________________
            Incubator mailing list
            [hidden email] [hidden email]
            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
            <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>


        --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
        T: <a href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" value="+14186965056" target="_blank">+1 418-696-5056 #202 <a class="m_-7047382075905815230m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202" target="_blank"><tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
        Mapgears
        http://www.mapgears.com/

        _______________________________________________
        Incubator mailing list
        [hidden email] [hidden email]
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
        <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




    --     ************************************
    David William Bitner
    dbSpatial LLC
    <a href="tel:612-424-9932" value="+16124249932" target="_blank">612-424-9932 <a class="m_-7047382075905815230m_8336552118485170558moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="tel:612-424-9932" target="_blank"><tel:612-424-9932>

    _______________________________________________
    Incubator mailing list
    [hidden email] [hidden email]
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
    <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>




_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-- 
Cameron Shorter
M <a href="tel:%2B61%20419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank">+61 419 142 254

_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator



_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Incubator] MOTION: GeoNode Graduation from OSGeo Incubation

Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Jody,

Thank you for your feedback.
Can we consider this motion passed or the motion has to be done again
(due to long time discussions)?
If the motion is passed, we need to add the GeoNode graduation to the
agenda for the next Board meeting (3 Nov)

Best,
Angelos

On 10/26/2016 09:44 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:

> Grrr ... too many projects with geo in the name - perhaps we should make
> add that to the graduation checklist.
>
> Congratulations to the GeoNode team; this is especially nice as the project
> was donated to OSGeo (so it is great that it now meets the expectations we
> have for our projects).
>
> I am interested, as always, in feedback on incubation - what worked, what
> did not, what was a surprise, and if we missed anything.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 25 October 2016 at 23:09, Jody Garnett <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> That is great, thanks for checking Cameron.
>>
>> I am happy to change my vote to a +1. Congrats to the GeoGig team.
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 24 October 2016 at 12:56, Cameron Shorter <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've checked and confirm that the oversight identified in the earlier
>>> review has been addressed and I'm now +1 for graduation. Congratulations
>>> for a job well done.
>>>
>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>
>>> On 21/10/2016 9:03 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since there is a -1 on the table about our OSGeo incubation, I would like
>>> to volunteer to compile a Release Procedure that is up to the standards of
>>> the incubation committee.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Angelos
>>>
>>> On 09/04/2016 01:25 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've just checked the check list. GeoNode looks to be in great shape. I'd
>>> also like to comment that through my involvement packaging GeoNode on
>>> OSGeo-Live that we have seen a responsive and health community project.
>>>
>>> However, it seems there isn't a link to the release process here:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist#Rel
>>> ease_Procedure
>>>
>>> So I'm currently -1 on graduation till answers are added to the Release
>>> Procedure. (I'm assuming this is just an oversight).
>>>
>>> While not approved by the incubation committee, I have added suggestions
>>> for a next version of the incubation list here:
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
>>> While nothing on this list should prevent current incubation, I suggest
>>> running your eye over it and see if there is anything else worth
>>> addressing.
>>> In particular, I suggest that somewhere in your processes you link to the
>>> OSGeo code of conduct.
>>>
>>> On 2/09/2016 2:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>
>>> You are correct David, twice:
>>> - incubation finding issues is the point, we do not ask that the issues
>>> are fixed during incubation only that they are listed as known problems (so
>>> potential users are aware and can decide to help out or steer clear as
>>> appropriate).
>>> - none of the issues I found were that interesting, indeed my check went
>>> a bit further then I was able to email (for example confirming with Jeff
>>> that the sample data was obtained under asuitable license)
>>>
>>> That said I would applicate an extra set of eyes on the checklist, I am
>>> interested in any work that needed to be done during incubation (such as
>>> you updating the headers - although I guess that was due to the code
>>> changing ownership).
>>>
>>> It is my hope to continue working through the checklist and respond with
>>> a firm +1, currently I am at an enthusiastic +0 :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 30 August 2016 at 09:07, David William Bitner <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]> <[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>      Just to bump this a bit as many were traveling when the motion
>>>      went out.
>>>
>>>      The GeoNode team is actively addressing the concerns that Jody
>>>      brought up, all of which are valuable items, but I do not believe
>>>      any are showstoppers. If there are any additional concerns, please
>>>      bring them up here.
>>>
>>>      Here is the current status on votes:
>>>
>>>        * Bruce Bannerman
>>>        * Bob (CI-StPaul) Basques +1
>>>        * Landon Blake +1
>>>        * Howard Butler
>>>        * Arnulf Christl +1
>>>        * Jody Garnett (chair)
>>>        * Dimitris Kotzinos
>>>        * Tom Kralidis +1
>>>        * Julien-Samuel Lacroix +1
>>>        * Mark Lucas
>>>        * Steve Lime +1
>>>        * Daniel Morissette
>>>        * Markus Schneider
>>>        * Cameron Shorter
>>>        * Jeroen Ticheler
>>>        * Norman Vine
>>>        * Frank Warmerdam
>>>
>>>
>>>      On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
>>>      <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> <[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>          +1
>>>
>>>          Julien
>>>
>>>          On 2016-08-25 11:28 AM, David William Bitner wrote:
>>>
>>>              Dear Incubation Committee,
>>>
>>>              As the mentor for GeoNode Incubation, I would like to make
>>>              a motion to
>>>              graduate GeoNode from the OSGeo incubation process with
>>>              Jeff Johnson to
>>>              act as the Project Officer.
>>>
>>>              You will find the Incubation Checklist at:
>>>
>>>              https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist
>>>              <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>
>>> <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoNode_Incubation_Checklist>
>>>
>>>              During the incubation process much work has been done to
>>>              solidify the
>>>              intellectual property behind GeoNode.
>>>
>>>                * copyright was transferred from the now dissolved
>>> OpenPlans
>>>                * a Contributor License Agreement has been adopted and a
>>>              process
>>>                  created to collect from all contributors
>>>                * all files have been checked for headers
>>>                * the release process documentation has been shored up
>>>
>>>              GeoNode has a tremendous "bus quotient" as there are core
>>>              developers
>>>              distributed globally. Many of the institutional direct
>>>              users have
>>>              developed strong expertise in GeoNode along with many
>>>              companies that
>>>              have developed support programs built around GeoNode.
>>>              There is no single
>>>              point of failure for this project.
>>>
>>>              The GeoNode has managed to work in the open from inception
>>>              in a way that
>>>              has enabled enormous amounts of collaboration both between
>>>              institutions
>>>              using GeoNode and companies/individuals providing support
>>>              for GeoNode.
>>>
>>>              Thanks,
>>>
>>>              David
>>>
>>>              --
>>>              ************************************
>>>              David William Bitner
>>>              dbSpatial LLC
>>>              612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932> <612-424-9932>
>>>
>>>
>>>              _______________________________________________
>>>              Incubator mailing list
>>>              [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>              http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>              <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>          --         Julien-Samuel Lacroix
>>>          T: +1 418-696-5056 #202 <tel:%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
>>> <%2B1%20418-696-5056%20%23202>
>>>          Mapgears
>>>          http://www.mapgears.com/
>>>
>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>          Incubator mailing list
>>>          [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>          http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>          <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      --     ************************************
>>>      David William Bitner
>>>      dbSpatial LLC
>>>      612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932> <612-424-9932>
>>>
>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>      Incubator mailing list
>>>      [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>      http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>      <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing [hidden email]://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
>>> OSGeo Charter Memberhttp://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cameron Shorter
>>> M +61 419 142 254
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Incubator mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>
>>


--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
geonode-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel