Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.0.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-develbranch6
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by sbl):

 Changes by @dnewcomb do not seem to be applied in trunk...
 A glitch or on purpose?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:14>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.0.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-develbranch6
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by neteler):

 Replying to [comment:14 sbl]:
 > Changes by @dnewcomb do not seem to be applied in trunk...
 > A glitch or on purpose?

 Do you refer to these two attachments?

 types.h.diff​ (500 bytes) - added by dnewcomb 5 years ago.
     diff file for types.h in r.terraflow directory
 3scan.h.diff​ (520 bytes) - added by dnewcomb 5 years ago.
     diff file for 3scan.h in r.terraflow directory

 If they should be applied, pls open an updated PR at
 https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pulls

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:15>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
In reply to this post by GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.0.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-develbranch6
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by dnewcomb):

 My guess is a glitch.  I am on the way out the door for vacation.  Feel
 free to apply before I get back.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:16>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
In reply to this post by GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.0.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-develbranch6
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by sbl):

 OK, please check:
 https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/31

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:17>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
In reply to this post by GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  reopened
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.8.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-trunk
Resolution:               |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by sbl):

 * status:  closed => reopened
 * version:  svn-develbranch6 => svn-trunk
 * resolution:  fixed =>
 * milestone:  7.0.0 => 7.8.0


Comment:

 Backporting candidate when tested properly?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:18>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GRASS GIS] #1421: scalability of r.terraflow

GRASS GIS
In reply to this post by GRASS GIS
#1421: scalability of r.terraflow
--------------------------+--------------------------------------
  Reporter:  dnewcomb     |      Owner:  grass-dev@…
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  reopened
  Priority:  normal       |  Milestone:  7.8.0
 Component:  Raster       |    Version:  svn-trunk
Resolution:               |   Keywords:  r.terraflow, large grids
       CPU:  x86-64       |   Platform:  Linux
--------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by wenzeslaus):

 Replying to [comment:18 sbl]:
 > Backporting candidate when tested properly?

 I would say this is a feature, so we should not backport this.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1421#comment:19>
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org>


_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev