Quantcast

OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
15 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

christopher.schmidt
The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!

As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31 tickets,
resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.

We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
in your applications, include the following tag in your
OpenLayers-powered page:

<script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>

As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
milestone.

--
Christopher Schmidt

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

RICHARD Didier

> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>
> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
> tickets,
> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>

There is a typo found in the release notes
(http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/wiki/Release/2.11/Notes) :

* To reduce the overhead of creating objects we have greatly optimized our
Class implementation. #2889

ticket number should be #2899, shouldn't it be ?

regards,

didier

>
> --
> Christopher Schmidt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>


--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Volker Mische
In reply to this post by christopher.schmidt
On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>
> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31 tickets,
> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>
> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
> in your applications, include the following tag in your
> OpenLayers-powered page:
>
> <script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>
> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
> milestone.
>

Hi all,

I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the JSONP
(OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?

http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417

Is there anything I can do to make it happen?

The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such more
restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
CouchDB/GeoCouch.

Cheers,
   Volker
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Xavier Mamano (jorix)
In reply to this post by christopher.schmidt
Hi,

I downloaded OpenLayers-2.11-rc2.zip, I noticed that contains patches of 2.12
All 2.12 revisions until 8-8-2011 are in the 2.11 RC2. And improvement of these patches are not in the realease notes, an example: #3343

Is that correct?

Xavier Mamano


christopher.schmidt wrote
The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!

As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31 tickets,
resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.

We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
in your applications, include the following tag in your
OpenLayers-powered page:

<script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
milestone.

--
Christopher Schmidt

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Marc Jansen-2
Hi Xavier,

find comments inline.

On 15.08.2011 13:58, Xavier Mamano (jorix) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded OpenLayers-2.11-rc2.zip, I noticed that contains patches of
> 2.12

I guess that is because nobody objected to this suggestion of Chris:

"I assume that we should just re-branch from trunk for RC2, unless
someone objects." (see
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/openlayers-dev/2011-July/007777.html)

Thinking that further, any improvements to these 2.12-patches might end
up in 2.11 as pullups, right?

Best regards,
Marc


> All 2.12 revisions until 8-8-2011 are in the 2.11 RC2. And improvement of
> these patches are not in the realease notes, an example: #3343
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Xavier Mamano
>
>
>
> christopher.schmidt wrote:
>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>
>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>> tickets,
>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>
>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>
>>
>>
>> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>> milestone.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Schmidt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OpenLayers-2-11-RC2-tp6664477p6687212.html
> Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)-2
Hi Marc, Xavier,

I think what Xavier means is that the release notes are currently out of date, and he is right about that. 

Some of the stuff that has been added in trunk after 2.11RC1, such as the work Tim did on the editing tools (ticket 3343 like Xavier points out) is not mentioned in the release notes.

So we need to update the release notes, any volunteers :-) ?

Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS - http://osgis.nl

On Aug 15, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Marc Jansen wrote:

Hi Xavier,

find comments inline.

On 15.08.2011 13:58, Xavier Mamano (jorix) wrote:
Hi,

I downloaded OpenLayers-2.11-rc2.zip, I noticed that contains patches of
2.12

I guess that is because nobody objected to this suggestion of Chris:

"I assume that we should just re-branch from trunk for RC2, unless
someone objects." (see
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/openlayers-dev/2011-July/007777.html)

Thinking that further, any improvements to these 2.12-patches might end
up in 2.11 as pullups, right?

Best regards,
Marc


All 2.12 revisions until 8-8-2011 are in the 2.11 RC2. And improvement of
these patches are not in the realease notes, an example: #3343

Is that correct?

Xavier Mamano



christopher.schmidt wrote:
The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!

As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
tickets,
resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.

We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
in your applications, include the following tag in your
OpenLayers-powered page:



As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
milestone.

--
Christopher Schmidt

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev


--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OpenLayers-2-11-RC2-tp6664477p6687212.html
Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev


_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Tim Schaub
In reply to this post by Volker Mische
I committed Volker's patch for http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417

I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release
manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop at
some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression
should warrant a new RC.

Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately
after we talked about it some weeks ago.

Tim

On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:

> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>
>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>> tickets,
>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>
>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>
>> <script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>
>> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>> milestone.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the JSONP
> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>
> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>
> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such more
> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>
> Cheers,
> Volker
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

christopher.schmidt
We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull this
into the RC3.

It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll leave
those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on them,
then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
additional regressions.

-- Chris

On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:

> I committed Volker's patch for http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>
> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression should warrant a new RC.
>
> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately after we talked about it some weeks ago.
>
> Tim
>
> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>>
>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>>> tickets,
>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>>
>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>>
>>> <script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>>
>>> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>>> milestone.
>>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the JSONP
>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>
>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>>
>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such more
>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
>> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Volker
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Volker Mische
Thank you so much Tim an Chris.

Cheers,
   Volker

On 08/15/2011 10:16 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull this
> into the RC3.
>
> It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll leave
> those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on them,
> then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
> additional regressions.
>
> -- Chris
>
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:
>
>> I committed Volker's patch for http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>
>> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression should warrant a new RC.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately after we talked about it some weeks ago.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
>>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>>>
>>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>>>> tickets,
>>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>>>
>>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
>>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>>>
>>>> <script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>>>
>>>> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
>>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>>>> milestone.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the JSONP
>>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>
>>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>>>
>>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such more
>>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
>>> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
>>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Volker
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Tim Schaub
In reply to this post by christopher.schmidt
The full build was also failing (on some systems) due to a missing requires.
http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3467

Please pull this into RC3 as well.

Thanks,
Tim

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM,  <[hidden email]> wrote:

> We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull this
> into the RC3.
>
> It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll leave
> those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on them,
> then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
> additional regressions.
>
> -- Chris
>
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:
>
>> I committed Volker's patch for http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>
>> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression should warrant a new RC.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately after we talked about it some weeks ago.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
>>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>>>
>>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>>>> tickets,
>>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>>>
>>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test 2.11
>>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>>>
>>>> <script src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>>>
>>>> As always, the source is available at http://openlayers.org/download/.
>>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>>>> milestone.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the JSONP
>>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>
>>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>>>
>>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such more
>>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
>>> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
>>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Volker
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>
>



--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
Expert service straight from the developers.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

RICHARD Didier

> The full build was also failing (on some systems) due to a missing
> requires.
> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3467
>
> Please pull this into RC3 as well.
>

Hi all,

I may have another regression between OL 2.10 and OL 2.11 RC2 :

* OL 2.10 :

OpenLayers.Layer.setOpacity() : the inner divs are changed when modifying
the layer's opacity

* OL 2.11 :

the layer's opacity seems to be now managed at the layer's div directly.

If we have a look at OpenLayers.Tile.Image.initImgDiv() method, one can
find :

if(this.layer.opacity != null) {

    OpenLayers.Util.modifyDOMElement(this.imgDiv, null, null, null,
                                     null, null, null,
                                     this.layer.opacity);
}

when the tile's div is created.

Calling layer.setOpacity() does not change the tile's opacity anymore (in
fact, if you start with an opacity of 30%, then you have got 30% on the
layer's div and 30% on the tile's opacity ...).

I guess the above lines could be removed from initImgDiv(). Don't know
whether there are other pitfalls related with the new opacity management.

Any thought on that ?

didier

> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM,  <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull
>> this
>> into the RC3.
>>
>> It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll
>> leave
>> those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on them,
>> then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
>> additional regressions.
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:
>>
>>> I committed Volker's patch for
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>
>>> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release
>>> manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop
>>> at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression
>>> should warrant a new RC.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately
>>> after we talked about it some weeks ago.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second
>>>>> release
>>>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>>>>
>>>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>>>>> tickets,
>>>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>>>>
>>>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test
>>>>> 2.11
>>>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>>>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>>>>
>>>>> <script
>>>>> src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>>>>
>>>>> As always, the source is available at
>>>>> http://openlayers.org/download/.
>>>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
>>>>> milestone.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the
>>>> JSONP
>>>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>>>>
>>>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such
>>>> more
>>>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
>>>> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
>>>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Volker
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tim Schaub
> OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>


--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)-2
Hi Didier,

I believe this was reverted after RC2, see also:


Would be good to test with either trunk or the to be released RC3.

TIA.

Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS - http://osgis.nl

On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, RICHARD Didier wrote:


The full build was also failing (on some systems) due to a missing
requires.
http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3467

Please pull this into RC3 as well.


Hi all,

I may have another regression between OL 2.10 and OL 2.11 RC2 :

* OL 2.10 :

OpenLayers.Layer.setOpacity() : the inner divs are changed when modifying
the layer's opacity

* OL 2.11 :

the layer's opacity seems to be now managed at the layer's div directly.

If we have a look at OpenLayers.Tile.Image.initImgDiv() method, one can
find :

if(this.layer.opacity != null) {

   OpenLayers.Util.modifyDOMElement(this.imgDiv, null, null, null,
                                    null, null, null,
                                    this.layer.opacity);
}

when the tile's div is created.

Calling layer.setOpacity() does not change the tile's opacity anymore (in
fact, if you start with an opacity of 30%, then you have got 30% on the
layer's div and 30% on the tile's opacity ...).

I guess the above lines could be removed from initImgDiv(). Don't know
whether there are other pitfalls related with the new opacity management.

Any thought on that ?

didier

Thanks,
Tim

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM,  <[hidden email]> wrote:
We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull
this
into the RC3.

It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll
leave
those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on them,
then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
additional regressions.

-- Chris

On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:

I committed Volker's patch for
http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417

I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the release
manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop
at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear regression
should warrant a new RC.

Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately
after we talked about it some weeks ago.

Tim

On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second
release
candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!

As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
tickets,
resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.

We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test
2.11
in your applications, include the following tag in your
OpenLayers-powered page:

<script
src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>

As always, the source is available at
http://openlayers.org/download/.
Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and 2.11
milestone.


Hi all,

I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the
JSONP
(OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?

http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417

Is there anything I can do to make it happen?

The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such
more
restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
CouchDB/GeoCouch.

Cheers,
Volker
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev





--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
Expert service straight from the developers.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev



--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)-2
In reply to this post by RICHARD Didier
Hi Didier,

thanks for your report, fixed:


Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS - http://osgis.nl

On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:19 AM, RICHARD Didier wrote:


The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second release
candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!

As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
tickets,
resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.


There is a typo found in the release notes
(http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/wiki/Release/2.11/Notes) :

* To reduce the overhead of creating objects we have greatly optimized our
Class implementation. #2889

ticket number should be #2899, shouldn't it be ?

regards,

didier


--
Christopher Schmidt

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev



--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

RICHARD Didier
In reply to this post by Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)-2

> Hi Didier,
>

Hi Bart,

> I believe this was reverted after RC2, see also:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3431
>
> Would be good to test with either trunk or the to be released RC3.
>

I'm awaiting for RC3 in that case !

Best regards,

didier

> TIA.
>
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
> --
> Bart van den Eijnden
> OSGIS - http://osgis.nl
>
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, RICHARD Didier wrote:
>
>>
>>> The full build was also failing (on some systems) due to a missing
>>> requires.
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3467
>>>
>>> Please pull this into RC3 as well.
>>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I may have another regression between OL 2.10 and OL 2.11 RC2 :
>>
>> * OL 2.10 :
>>
>> OpenLayers.Layer.setOpacity() : the inner divs are changed when
>> modifying
>> the layer's opacity
>>
>> * OL 2.11 :
>>
>> the layer's opacity seems to be now managed at the layer's div directly.
>>
>> If we have a look at OpenLayers.Tile.Image.initImgDiv() method, one can
>> find :
>>
>> if(this.layer.opacity != null) {
>>
>>    OpenLayers.Util.modifyDOMElement(this.imgDiv, null, null, null,
>>                                     null, null, null,
>>                                     this.layer.opacity);
>> }
>>
>> when the tile's div is created.
>>
>> Calling layer.setOpacity() does not change the tile's opacity anymore
>> (in
>> fact, if you start with an opacity of 30%, then you have got 30% on the
>> layer's div and 30% on the tile's opacity ...).
>>
>> I guess the above lines could be removed from initImgDiv(). Don't know
>> whether there are other pitfalls related with the new opacity
>> management.
>>
>> Any thought on that ?
>>
>> didier
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM,  <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to pull
>>>> this
>>>> into the RC3.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll
>>>> leave
>>>> those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on
>>>> them,
>>>> then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
>>>> additional regressions.
>>>>
>>>> -- Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I committed Volker's patch for
>>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>>>
>>>>> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the
>>>>> release
>>>>> manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to stop
>>>>> at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear
>>>>> regression
>>>>> should warrant a new RC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately
>>>>> after we talked about it some weeks ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>>>>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional 31
>>>>>>> tickets,
>>>>>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test
>>>>>>> 2.11
>>>>>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
>>>>>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <script
>>>>>>> src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As always, the source is available at
>>>>>>> http://openlayers.org/download/.
>>>>>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and
>>>>>>> 2.11
>>>>>>> milestone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the
>>>>>> JSONP
>>>>>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy as
>>>>>> possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
>>>>>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Volker
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dev mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim Schaub
>>> OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
>>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
>> 2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
>> Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>>
>
>


--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: OpenLayers 2.11 RC2

RICHARD Didier
Le lundi 5 septembre 2011 11:24:27, Bart van den Eijnden a écrit :
> Hi Didier,
>

Hi Bart,

> did you have a chance to verify this with OL 2.11 RC3 or RC4?
>

Yes, I did : RC3/RC4 : the opacity has been reverted to what it was in OL 2.10 !!
So, okay for me.

Regards,

didier

> TIA.
>
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
> >> Hi Didier,
> >
> > Hi Bart,
> >
> >> I believe this was reverted after RC2, see also:
> >>
> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3431
> >>
> >> Would be good to test with either trunk or the to be released RC3.
> >
> > I'm awaiting for RC3 in that case !
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > didier
> >
> >> TIA.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Bart
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bart van den Eijnden
> >> OSGIS - http://osgis.nl
> >>
> >> On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, RICHARD Didier wrote:
> >>>> The full build was also failing (on some systems) due to a missing
> >>>> requires.
> >>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3467
> >>>>
> >>>> Please pull this into RC3 as well.
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I may have another regression between OL 2.10 and OL 2.11 RC2 :
> >>>
> >>> * OL 2.10 :
> >>>
> >>> OpenLayers.Layer.setOpacity() : the inner divs are changed when
> >>> modifying
> >>> the layer's opacity
> >>>
> >>> * OL 2.11 :
> >>>
> >>> the layer's opacity seems to be now managed at the layer's div
> >>> directly.
> >>>
> >>> If we have a look at OpenLayers.Tile.Image.initImgDiv() method, one can
> >>> find :
> >>>
> >>> if(this.layer.opacity != null) {
> >>>
> >>>   OpenLayers.Util.modifyDOMElement(this.imgDiv, null, null, null,
> >>>  
> >>>                                    null, null, null,
> >>>                                    this.layer.opacity);
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> when the tile's div is created.
> >>>
> >>> Calling layer.setOpacity() does not change the tile's opacity anymore
> >>> (in
> >>> fact, if you start with an opacity of 30%, then you have got 30% on the
> >>> layer's div and 30% on the tile's opacity ...).
> >>>
> >>> I guess the above lines could be removed from initImgDiv(). Don't know
> >>> whether there are other pitfalls related with the new opacity
> >>> management.
> >>>
> >>> Any thought on that ?
> >>>
> >>> didier
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Tim
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM,  <[hidden email]>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> We have a clear regression that will force an RC3. I'm willing to
> >>>>> pull this
> >>>>> into the RC3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It looks like there's still a few outstanding bugs against RC2. I'll
> >>>>> leave
> >>>>> those open for another day or two, but if there's not more done on
> >>>>> them,
> >>>>> then I'm likely to proceed without waiting on further fixes, barring
> >>>>> additional regressions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:33 PM, ext Tim Schaub wrote:
> >>>>>> I committed Volker's patch for
> >>>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've added my thoughts on the ticket.  I'll leave it up to the
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>> manager to decide if this is pulled into another RC.  We have to
> >>>>>> stop at some point, and I think we'd all agree that only a clear
> >>>>>> regression
> >>>>>> should warrant a new RC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for the patch Volker.  Sorry I didn't pick it up immediately
> >>>>>> after we talked about it some weeks ago.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tim
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/14/11 11:07 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 08/08/2011 04:20 PM, [hidden email] wrote:
> >>>>>>>> The OpenLayers Development Team is proud to announce the second
> >>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> candidate of OpenLayers 2.11!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As of 2.11-RC2, the OpenLayers 2.11 release closes an additional
> >>>>>>>> 31 tickets,
> >>>>>>>> resolving a number of issues with the previous release candidate.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We invite you to help us test the 2.11 release candidate! To test
> >>>>>>>> 2.11
> >>>>>>>> in your applications, include the following tag in your
> >>>>>>>> OpenLayers-powered page:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <script
> >>>>>>>> src="http://openlayers.org/api/2.11-rc2/OpenLayers.js"></script>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As always, the source is available at
> >>>>>>>> http://openlayers.org/download/.
> >>>>>>>> Bug reports can be filed in Trac, under the 2.11 RC2 version and
> >>>>>>>> 2.11
> >>>>>>>> milestone.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I somehow missed this 2.11 RC2 mail. Is there a chance to get the
> >>>>>>> JSONP
> >>>>>>> (OpenLayers.Protocol.Script) improvements into 2.11?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3417
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is there anything I can do to make it happen?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The reason why I really want it in is, that also CouchDB uses such
> >>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>> restrictive callback name validation and I'd like to make as easy
> >>>>>>> as possible for people to use OpenLayers/MapQuery with a remote
> >>>>>>> CouchDB/GeoCouch.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Volker
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Dev mailing list
> >>>>>> [hidden email]
> >>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tim Schaub
> >>>> OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
> >>>> Expert service straight from the developers.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Dev mailing list
> >>>> [hidden email]
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
> >>> 2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
> >>> Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Dev mailing list
> >>> [hidden email]
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
Loading...