|
|
|
|
Arnulf/Bruce,
If I trust https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_Membership there would one free slot of OSGeo's OGC Personal Membership. I'd like to benefit from it to take part to the works of the GeoTIFF SWG if that's possible.
Thanks,
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Hi Even,
This is OK by me.
It is good to see that these OGC Memberships are becoming so popular within our community.
It shows the value that we place in them, and from my viewpoint is very encouraging to see.
I can see that this demand for the OGC memberships will only increase, so it may be prudent for us to set some ground rules for future memberships, to help us as a community to select the best people to represent us within the OGC community.
At a minimum, I think that we will need to start insisting on regular updates as per the current requirements.
Can anyone suggest an appropriate selection process?
Do we keep the current ad hoc process, membership slot by membership slot? Or do we just call for expressions of interest once per year, with a process to fill positions that may become vacant during the year?
We do need something open, to cater for a situation where a member of the selection committee wishes to take up a membership as I recently did.
I’m interested in your thoughts.
Kind regards,
Bruce
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
Administrator
|
Hi Bruce,
I'm glad you asked about the process, because I was wondering if I could
join the selection committee (as I also think the OSGeo-OGC relationship
is very important). I could join you and Arnulf, to help manage this,
and the process. (to be honest I have no plans for changing anything,
just throwing my hat in to help).
-jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKennaOn 2017-09-22 8:57 PM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
> Hi Even,
>
> This is OK by me.
>
> It is good to see that these OGC Memberships are becoming so popular
> within our community.
>
> It shows the value that we place in them, and from my viewpoint is very
> encouraging to see.
>
> I can see that this demand for the OGC memberships will only increase,
> so it may be prudent for us to set some ground rules for future
> memberships, to help us as a community to select the best people to
> represent us within the OGC community.
>
> At a minimum, I think that we will need to start insisting on regular
> updates as per the current requirements.
>
> Can anyone suggest an appropriate selection process?
>
> Do we keep the current ad hoc process, membership slot by membership
> slot? Or do we just call for expressions of interest once per year,
> with a process to fill positions that may become vacant during the year?
>
> We do need something open, to cater for a situation where a member of
> the selection committee wishes to take up a membership as I recently did.
>
> I’m interested in your thoughts.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 21 Sep 2017, at 23:13, Even Rouault < [hidden email]
>> <mailto: [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>> Arnulf/Bruce,
>>
>> If I trust https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_Membership there would one
>> free slot of OSGeo's OGC Personal Membership. I'd like to benefit from
>> it to take part to the works of the GeoTIFF SWG if that's possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Even
>>
>> --
>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>> http://www.spatialys.com < http://www.spatialys.com/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Standards mailing list
>> [hidden email] <mailto: [hidden email]>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards>
>
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Hi Jeff,
That sounds great and I know that your help would be welcomed.
Let’s see how this thread develops and take it from there, once we have a better understanding of how we are to work together as a group.
Kind regards,
Bruce
> On 23 Sep 2017, at 11:04 am, Jeff McKenna < [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I'm glad you asked about the process, because I was wondering if I could join the selection committee (as I also think the OSGeo-OGC relationship is very important). I could join you and Arnulf, to help manage this, and the process. (to be honest I have no plans for changing anything, just throwing my hat in to help).
>
> -jeff
>
>
> --
> Jeff McKenna
> President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKenna>
>
>> On 2017-09-22 8:57 PM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
>> Hi Even,
>> This is OK by me.
>> It is good to see that these OGC Memberships are becoming so popular within our community.
>> It shows the value that we place in them, and from my viewpoint is very encouraging to see.
>> I can see that this demand for the OGC memberships will only increase, so it may be prudent for us to set some ground rules for future memberships, to help us as a community to select the best people to represent us within the OGC community.
>> At a minimum, I think that we will need to start insisting on regular updates as per the current requirements.
>> Can anyone suggest an appropriate selection process?
>> Do we keep the current ad hoc process, membership slot by membership slot? Or do we just call for expressions of interest once per year, with a process to fill positions that may become vacant during the year?
>> We do need something open, to cater for a situation where a member of the selection committee wishes to take up a membership as I recently did.
>> I’m interested in your thoughts.
>> Kind regards,
>> Bruce
>>> On 21 Sep 2017, at 23:13, Even Rouault < [hidden email] <mailto: [hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Arnulf/Bruce,
>>>
>>> If I trust https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OGC_Membership there would one free slot of OSGeo's OGC Personal Membership. I'd like to benefit from it to take part to the works of the GeoTIFF SWG if that's possible.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Even
>>>
>>> --
>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>> http://www.spatialys.com < http://www.spatialys.com/>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Standards mailing list
>>> [hidden email] <mailto: [hidden email]>
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Hi,
Gentle ping to know what is required to make this moving forward.
Thanks,
Even
> Hi,
>
> > This is OK by me.
>
> Thanks. Should we wait for Arnulf's opinion too ?
>
> Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Hi Even,
Thanks for the prompt.
Please proceed, there have been no objections.
Barbara will send you some paperwork that you will need to complete prior to taking up your membership slot.
Kind regards,
Bruce
> On 5 Oct 2017, at 10:36 pm, Even Rouault < [hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping to know what is required to make this moving forward.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Even
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > This is OK by me.
> >
> > Thanks. Should we wait for Arnulf's opinion too ?
> >
> > Even
>
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Folks,
I have been away for some time, sorry for the delay. Jachym privately
pinged me yesterday night to wake up.
Thanks Bruce for going ahead. There are no objections from my side for
Even to use one of the Open OSGeo Slots.
Best regards,
Arnulf
Am 2017-10-06 um 06:13 schrieb Bruce Bannerman:
> Hi Even,
>
> Thanks for the prompt.
>
> Please proceed, there have been no objections.
>
> Barbara will send you some paperwork that you will need to complete prior to taking up your membership slot.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 5 Oct 2017, at 10:36 pm, Even Rouault < [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gentle ping to know what is required to make this moving forward.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Even
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> This is OK by me.
>>> Thanks. Should we wait for Arnulf's opinion too ?
>>>
>>> Even
>>
>>
>> --
>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>> http://www.spatialys.com> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards--
Spatially enabling your business
http://metaspatial.net_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
thank you all pá 6. 10. 2017 v 9:19 odesílatel Arnulf Christl (Metaspatial) < [hidden email]> napsal: Folks,
I have been away for some time, sorry for the delay. Jachym privately
pinged me yesterday night to wake up.
Thanks Bruce for going ahead. There are no objections from my side for
Even to use one of the Open OSGeo Slots.
Best regards,
Arnulf
Am 2017-10-06 um 06:13 schrieb Bruce Bannerman:
> Hi Even,
>
> Thanks for the prompt.
>
> Please proceed, there have been no objections.
>
> Barbara will send you some paperwork that you will need to complete prior to taking up your membership slot.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 5 Oct 2017, at 10:36 pm, Even Rouault <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gentle ping to know what is required to make this moving forward.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Even
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> This is OK by me.
>>> Thanks. Should we wait for Arnulf's opinion too ?
>>>
>>> Even
>>
>>
>> --
>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
--
Spatially enabling your business
http://metaspatial.net
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards _______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 09:10:51 CEST Arnulf Christl (Metaspatial) wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have been away for some time, sorry for the delay. Jachym privately
> pinged me yesterday night to wake up.
>
>
> Thanks Bruce for going ahead. There are no objections from my side for
> Even to use one of the Open OSGeo Slots.
Hi,
Thank you.
Best regards,
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
|
Hi Even,
I will get you in touch with Barbara in OGC and we can then process your participation.
Best Regards, Scott
Scott Simmons Executive Director, Standards Program Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) tel +1 970 682 1922 mob +1 970 214 9467
The OGC: Making Location Count…
On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 09:10:51 CEST Arnulf Christl (Metaspatial) wrote: > Folks, > > I have been away for some time, sorry for the delay. Jachym privately > pinged me yesterday night to wake up. > > > Thanks Bruce for going ahead. There are no objections from my side for > Even to use one of the Open OSGeo Slots. Hi, Thank you. Best regards, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services _______________________________________________Standards mailing list[hidden email]https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
|
|
Locked
