Dear all, We're proud to announce the release of GeoNetwork opensource v3.10.4 (http://geonetwork-opensource.org/). You can find the software at https://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork/files/GeoNetwork_opensource/v3.10.4/ You can find a list of new functionalities and fixes in v3.10.4 at https://geonetwork-opensource.org/manuals/trunk/en/overview/change-log/version-3.10.4.html If you have any improvements you want to contribute back, the best is to use git to get a local copy of the source code, apply the fix and put out a Pull request so your improvements can be integrated quickly. Otherwise you can also create new Tickets in the issue tracker: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues Thanks and congratulations to the all community members and developers that have been putting efforts and energy in this release! Jose García PSC Member _______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
Dear Jose, all,
Congratulations for the release! Can someone please update the OSGeoLive installer for this new release? https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/master/bin/install_geonetwork.sh Best regards, Angelos On 10/1/20 4:26 PM, Jose Garcia wrote: Dear all, We're proud to announce the release of GeoNetwork opensource v3.10.4 ( http://geonetwork-opensource.org/). You can find the software at https://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork /files/GeoNetwork_opensource/v3.10.4/ You can find a list of new functionalities and fixes in v3.10.4 at https://geonetwork-opensource.org/manuals/trunk/en/overview/change-log/version-3.10.4.html If you have any improvements you want to contribute back, the best is to use git to get a local copy of the source code, apply the fix and put out a Pull request so your improvements can be integrated quickly. Otherwise you can also create new Tickets in the issue tracker: https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/issues Thanks and congratulations to the all community members and developers that have been putting efforts and energy in this release! Jose García PSC Member -- Angelos Tzotsos, PhD President Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos _______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
In reply to this post by Jose Garcia
Congratulations on the release! I was going to offer to deploy the release to repo.osgeo.org but I see it is already done, and am surprised at the version number used:
I understood the point of using 3.10.4-SNAPSHOT was to make the next 3.10.4 release, the use of 3.10.4-0 forces maven to treat the version number as a string. 3.10.0-0 3.10.1-0 3.10.2-0 3.10.3-0 3.10.4-0 ... 3.6.0-0 3.8.0-0 (3.8.1 tag is 3.8.2-SNAPSHOT) (3.8.2 tag is actually 3.8.3-SNAPSHOT) 3.8.3-0 4.0.0-alpha.3 In the above list 3.10.4-0 should be listed after 3.8.3-0 but because it is being compared as a string it shows up in the wrong order. In the future can I recommend removing the "-SNAPSHOT" when making a release, so 3.10.4-SNAPSHOT becomes 3.10.4 on release. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 06:53, Jose Garcia <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
Hi Jody Thanks for the feedback, I'll update the scripts to remove the -0 suffix for the 3.10.5 version. Regards, Jose García On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:46 AM Jody Garnett <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
In reply to this post by Jose Garcia
I wanted to add to this release ... with the first formal release of iso191319.ca.HNAP: See the above release announcement crediting those who contributed, following the core-geonetwork example. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 06:53, Jose Garcia <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
In reply to this post by Jose Garcia
Hi Jose: I setup two PRs with this change for you: - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/5096 Change to 3.10-SNAPSHOT - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/5095 Change to 3.11-SNAPSHOT This change means that downstream projects can continue to compile against the master or 3.10.x branch and not have to be updated each time a release is made. I also double checked my research, and found a new article which actually tested with unit tests what maven does for both version definition and sort order, rather than trust the documentation! It is worth reading, I was not aware how complicated it is! - If I understand this document correctly your previous <major>.<minor>.<patch>-<build number> would indeed define okay - the difference between . and _ is ignored during sorting - It also indicates that 3.10.0 and 3.10.0-0 are sorted exactly the same! - And 4.0-alpha and 4.0a are aliases and also sort exactly the same Jody On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 22:53, Jose Garcia <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ GeoNetwork-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geonetwork-devel GeoNetwork OpenSource is maintained at http://sourceforge.net/projects/geonetwork |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |