Fwd: Re: 1.8 Blockers

[Marco Hugentobler-4]

Hi Tim
+1 for going ahead with the release. It is one of the rare moments without blockers now :-) .

Marco

Am 11.06.2012 12:54, schrieb Tim Sutton: > Hi All > > As many of you have probably seen there are no blockers left in the > queue. Any objects to going ahead with the release now? > > Regards > > Tim > -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Sourcepole - Linux& Open Source Solutions Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland [hidden email] http://www.sourcepole.ch Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Tim Sutton-4]

Hi All

OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.

Regards

Tim

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marco Hugentobler <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Tim
+1 for going ahead with the release. It is one of the rare moments without blockers now :-) .

Marco

Am 11.06.2012 12:54, schrieb Tim Sutton: > Hi All > > As many of you have probably seen there are no blockers left in the > queue. Any objects to going ahead with the release now? > > Regards > > Tim > -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Sourcepole - Linux& Open Source Solutions Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland [hidden email] http://www.sourcepole.ch Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Paolo Cavallini]

Il 11/06/2012 14:54, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Hi All
>
> OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.

I think we should keep on accepting them: if it is possible we can always (working in
master) issue a last minute fix, or schedule a bugfix release for later).
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Giuseppe Sucameli]

Hi all,

I'd prefer to wait few days (e.g. 3 days) before releasing 1.8
to be sure the latest fixes haven't generated new issues.

After the 1.7.x series with a lot of problems just after the releases,
we should release a stable version of QGis.

Regards

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Paolo Cavallini <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Il 11/06/2012 14:54, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> Hi All
>>
>> OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.
>
> I think we should keep on accepting them: if it is possible we can always (working in
> master) issue a last minute fix, or schedule a bugfix release for later).
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> www.faunalia.eu
> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
Giuseppe Sucameli
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Tim Sutton-4]

Hi

I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there are no new blockers reported.

Regards

Tim

On Jun 11, 2012 5:47 PM, "Giuseppe Sucameli" <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi all,

I'd prefer to wait few days (e.g. 3 days) before releasing 1.8
to be sure the latest fixes haven't generated new issues.

After the 1.7.x series with a lot of problems just after the releases,
we should release a stable version of QGis.

Regards

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Paolo Cavallini <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Il 11/06/2012 14:54, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> Hi All
>>
>> OK than we will stop accepting blockers for 1.8 and get on with it.
>
> I think we should keep on accepting them: if it is possible we can always (working in
> master) issue a last minute fix, or schedule a bugfix release for later).
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> www.faunalia.eu
> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



--
Giuseppe Sucameli
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Sandro Santilli-2]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:

> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there
> are no new blockers reported.

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20

on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64

Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)

--strk;
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Tim Sutton-4]

Hi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>
>> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag & branch if there
>> are no new blockers reported.
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
>
> on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64
>
> Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)
>

:-) In 2.0 lets have 200 tests instead of 20!

Regards

Tim


> --strk;



--
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[mbernasocchi]

On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:

> Hi
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>>
>>> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag&  branch if there
>>> are no new blockers reported.
>> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
>>
>> on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64
>>
>> Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)
>>
> :-) In 2.0 lets have 200 tests instead of 20!

what is the difference between make check and make tests?
all passed here as well, dont get scared of placebo's first submission
to cdash... just another spatialindex thing :)
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
>> --strk;
>
>

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Sandro Santilli-2]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:

> On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> >Hi
> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli<[hidden email]>  wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> >>
> >>>I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag&  branch if there
> >>>are no new blockers reported.
> >>100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
> >>
> >>on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64
> >>
> >>Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)
> >>
> >:-) In 2.0 lets have 200 tests instead of 20!
>
> what is the difference between make check and make tests?

"make check" is for GNU afficionados [1].
"make test" is for those who like to be different.

[1] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html#Standard-Targets

--strk;

  ,------o-.
  |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
  |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
  `-o------'

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[mbernasocchi]

On 06/12/2012 02:11 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
>> On 06/12/2012 01:44 PM, Tim Sutton wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sandro Santilli<[hidden email]>   wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will wait till tomorrow night and then go ahead and tag&   branch if there
>>>>> are no new blockers reported.
>>>> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 20
>>>>
>>>> on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Congrats for the "make check" service ! :)
>>>>
>>> :-) In 2.0 lets have 200 tests instead of 20!
>> what is the difference between make check and make tests?
> "make check" is for GNU afficionados [1].
> "make test" is for those who like to be different.

:) and qgis specific? since we have both :)

> [1] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html#Standard-Targets
>
> --strk;
>
>    ,------o-.
>    |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>    |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>    `-o------'
>

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Tim Sutton-4]

Hi

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Marco Bernasocchi
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>>>
>>> what is the difference between make check and make tests?
>>
>> "make check" is for GNU afficionados [1].
>> "make test" is for those who like to be different.
>
> :) and qgis specific? since we have both :)
>

make test is provided my cmake
make check was added to keep Sandro 100% topologically happy :-)
make Experimental is if you want to share your test and keep me 100%
dashingly happy

>
>> [1]
>> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html#Standard-Targets
>>
>> --strk;
>>
>>   ,------o-.
>>   |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>>   |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>>   `-o------'
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer