Dear all, I am starting to set up the academic track for the coming conference. The most convenient would be to have just extended abstracts. Those accepted could later be archived. What formats were used in past conferences? As far as I know no one ever produced Proceedings or formal things of the like. Thank you. -- Luís Moreira de Sousa Bowlespark 8 6701 DN Wageningen The Netherlands Phone: +31 628 544 755 Email: [hidden email] RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c _______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
Dear Luís, proceedings were produced for both FOSS4G Europe 2015 and FOSS4G Europe 2017. - for FOSS4G Europe 2015 in Como, we first asked for abstracts and then for short or long papers (authors could choose), and we did publish Proceedings [1]. These proceedings included also the abstracts sent for the General Track and all the other Tracks we had. - for FOSS4G Europe 2017 in Paris, extended abstracts were first asked and then authors of accepted abstracts were asked to send a paper. Thanks to the great work of Maria Brovelli with ISPRS, these papers were published in The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences [2]. Cheers, Marco _______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
Thank you Marco, I was not aware of these Proceedings; we must aim at something similar this year. If I am not mistaken, last year EasyChair was used - was the full process managed there? And in 2015, which platform you used? If understand correctly, only the abstracts were reviewed? Or was there a second step for the full articles? Thank you. -- Luís Moreira de Sousa Bowlespark 8 6701 DN Wageningen The Netherlands Phone: +31 628 544 755 Email: [hidden email] RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c -------- Original Message -------- On January 21, 2018 12:54 PM, Marco Minghini <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
Last year we used easychair for managing the whole procedure.
We follow the "rules" of ISPRS, which require only the abstract to be reviewed.
Best regards
Maria
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
-------- Messaggio originale -------- Da: Luís Moreira de Sousa <[hidden email]> Data: 21/01/18 19:16 (GMT+01:00) A: Marco Minghini <[hidden email]> Cc: [hidden email] Oggetto: Re: [Conference-europe] FOSS4G-E Academic track Thank you Marco,
I was not aware of these Proceedings; we must aim at something similar this year. If I am not mistaken, last year EasyChair was used - was the full process managed there? And in 2015, which platform you used?
If understand correctly, only the abstracts were reviewed? Or was there a second step for the full articles?
Thank you.
--
Luís Moreira de Sousa
Bowlespark 8
6701 DN Wageningen
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 628 544 755
Email: [hidden email]
RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c
-------- Original Message --------
On January 21, 2018 12:54 PM, Marco Minghini <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
Thank you Maria, since only the abstract is reviewed we might opt for a simpler platform (the EasyChair help has been down for over a week any way). Another question: what was the length required for the abstracts in the academic track? Regards. -- Luís Moreira de Sousa Bowlespark 8 6701 DN Wageningen The Netherlands Phone: +31 628 544 755 Email: [hidden email] RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c -------- Original Message -------- On 21 January 2018 10:59 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
It was 500-800 words. Regards Maria
Pay attention to this Special Issue and see if it is of interest by you:
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/special_issues/Geospatial_Big_Data_Urban_Studies
Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli
Professor of GIS and Remote Sensing
Politecnico di Milano ISPRS WG IV/4 "Collaborative crowdsourced cloud mapping (C3M)" http://www2.isprs.org/commissions/comm4/wg4.html, Board of Directors of OSGeo; GeoForAll Advisory Board; NASA WorldWind Europa Challenge; SIFET Advisory Board
UN-GGIM Academic Network Deputy Chair, UN-GGIM Italy, UN OpenGIS Initiative (Chair of the Capacity Building WG)
Sol Katz
Award 2015
P.zza Leonardo da Vinci, 32 - Building 3 - 20133 Milano (Italy) Tel. +39-02-23996242 - Mob. +39-328-0023867, [hidden email][hidden email]
Da: Luís Moreira de Sousa <[hidden email]>
Inviato: lunedì 22 gennaio 2018 17:59 A: Maria Antonia Brovelli Cc: Marco Minghini; [hidden email] Oggetto: Re: R: [Conference-europe] FOSS4G-E Academic track Thank you Maria,
since only the abstract is reviewed we might opt for a simpler platform (the EasyChair help has been down for over a week any way). Another question: what was the length required for the abstracts in the academic track?
Regards.
--
Luís Moreira de Sousa
Bowlespark 8
6701 DN Wageningen
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 628 544 755
Email: [hidden email]
RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c
-------- Original Message --------
On 21 January 2018 10:59 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
In reply to this post by Marco Minghini
Hi,
2018-01-21 12:54 GMT+01:00 Marco Minghini <[hidden email]>: >> I am starting to set up the academic track for the coming conference. The most convenient would be to have just extended abstracts. Those accepted could later be >> archived. What formats were used in past conferences? As far as I know no one ever produced Proceedings or formal things of the like. [...] > - for FOSS4G Europe 2017 in Paris, extended abstracts were first asked and > then authors of accepted abstracts were asked to send a paper. Thanks to the > great work of Maria Brovelli with ISPRS, these papers were published in The > International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial > Information Sciences [2]. Another option is Geoinformatics CTU FCE journal [1]. BTW, in Paris ASAIK the organizers had deal with this journal about publishing papers in advance. At the end decision has been somehow changed as Marco described. Truly to say I was unhappy about that not because I am in editorial board of this journal, the real reason was different. The father of this journal, prof. Cepek is my close friend and it was not easy for me to explain him what happened. That's a story behind which should be noted here. @Luis, so please consider also this journal. Ma [1] https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/gi -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ Conference-Europe mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-europe |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |