Consideration of RFC process for implementation of WPS 2.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Consideration of RFC process for implementation of WPS 2.0

Vaibhav Khulbe
I think this is a good idea.
Vaibhav
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 17:00 Tom Kralidis <[hidden email]> wrote:
HI all: given this is significant work, should we consider an RFC process here?

..Tom

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Luí­s Moreira de Sousa
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> for reference, this is our 2018 GSoC page:
> https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/GSoC-2018-ideas
>
> Work on WPS 2.0 would much welcome. Best regards.
>
>
> --
> Luís Moreira de Sousa
> Bowlespark 8
> 6701 DN Wageningen
> The Netherlands
> Phone: +31 628 544 755
> Email: [hidden email]
> RingID: ring:7ca91d83f4f9dec82fec9f1144b8e5c1ef2a110c
> URL: https://ldesousa.github.io
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On March 26, 2018 8:36 PM, Vaibhav Khulbe <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I would like to buy some time to have a good look at it.
> Thanks a lot, sir,
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Martin Landa <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2018-03-26 20:26 GMT+02:00 Vaibhav Khulbe <[hidden email]>:
>> > obliged to have some leads on if the 'implementation of WPS 2.0
>> > standards
>>
>> WPS 2.0 allows stopping/pausing/resuming jobs. BTW, this could be
>> probably related/implemented by Docker job isolation as described in
>> [1]. Ma
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/ctu-geoforall-lab-projects/dp-laza-2018/blob/master/text/adam-laza-dp-2018.pdf
>>
>> --
>> Martin Landa
>> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
>> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev

_______________________________________________
pywps-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev