Quantcast

Comments in ticket needed

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Comments in ticket needed

jmckenna
Administrator
Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might just
update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore, OK to
remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.  Thanks!

-jeff




_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

James Klassen-2
Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development is on
github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.


On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

> Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
> trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might
> just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore,
> OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.
> Thanks!
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

jmckenna
Administrator
I'm not understanding your comment:  are you meaning to tell strk that
GeoMOOSE needs the Trac instance?  If yes, then please let him know
(that ticket is in regards to a 'hook', so he needs to know if you need
that still).  Sorry, must be my Friday brain :)

-jeff



On 2017-02-10 11:07 AM, Jim Klassen wrote:

> Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development is on
> github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.
>
>
> On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>> Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
>> trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might
>> just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore,
>> OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>


--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

jmckenna
Administrator
So maybe what you mean to tell strk is that the hook can be removed/not
needed, but please keep the trac instance?   -jeff




On 2017-02-10 11:20 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

> I'm not understanding your comment:  are you meaning to tell strk that
> GeoMOOSE needs the Trac instance?  If yes, then please let him know
> (that ticket is in regards to a 'hook', so he needs to know if you need
> that still).  Sorry, must be my Friday brain :)
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
> On 2017-02-10 11:07 AM, Jim Klassen wrote:
>> Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development is on
>> github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>>> Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
>>> trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might
>>> just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore,
>>> OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -jeff
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

James Klassen-2
In reply to this post by jmckenna
Does this clear it up?

GeoMoose would like its OSGeo Trac and SVN archived/preserved from a historical perspective.  GeoMoose does not expect we will be updating either in the future. (Which makes things like update hooks irrelevant.)

All current development is happening with github (repositories and issues) but history was not migrated when we moved active development from svn to git and from trac to github issues.

On Feb 10, 2017 09:21, "Jeff McKenna" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I'm not understanding your comment:  are you meaning to tell strk that GeoMOOSE needs the Trac instance?  If yes, then please let him know (that ticket is in regards to a 'hook', so he needs to know if you need that still).  Sorry, must be my Friday brain :)

-jeff



On 2017-02-10 11:07 AM, Jim Klassen wrote:
Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development is on
github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.


On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might
just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore,
OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.
Thanks!

-jeff




_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc



--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

jmckenna
Administrator
yes perfect, sorry.  :)

-jeff



On 2017-02-10 12:03 PM, James Klassen wrote:

> Does this clear it up?
>
> GeoMoose would like its OSGeo Trac and SVN archived/preserved from a
> historical perspective.  GeoMoose does not expect we will be updating
> either in the future. (Which makes things like update hooks irrelevant.)
>
> All current development is happening with github (repositories and
> issues) but history was not migrated when we moved active development
> from svn to git and from trac to github issues.
>
> On Feb 10, 2017 09:21, "Jeff McKenna" <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     I'm not understanding your comment:  are you meaning to tell strk
>     that GeoMOOSE needs the Trac instance?  If yes, then please let him
>     know (that ticket is in regards to a 'hook', so he needs to know if
>     you need that still).  Sorry, must be my Friday brain :)
>
>     -jeff
>
>
>
>     On 2017-02-10 11:07 AM, Jim Klassen wrote:
>
>         Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development
>         is on
>         github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.
>
>
>         On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>
>             Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the
>             GeoMOOSE
>             trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873
>             <https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873>  You might
>             just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac
>             instance anymore,
>             OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever
>             you feel.
>             Thanks!
>
>             -jeff
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             geomoose-psc mailing list
>             [hidden email]
>             <mailto:[hidden email]>
>             https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>             <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         geomoose-psc mailing list
>         [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>         <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Jeff McKenna
>     MapServer Consulting and Training Services
>     http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ <http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/>
>     _______________________________________________
>     geomoose-psc mailing list
>     [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc>
>


--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Comments in ticket needed

James Klassen-2
In reply to this post by James Klassen-2
No problem.  It does no good writing something if people can't interpret it.

On Feb 10, 2017 10:03, "James Klassen" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Does this clear it up?

GeoMoose would like its OSGeo Trac and SVN archived/preserved from a historical perspective.  GeoMoose does not expect we will be updating either in the future. (Which makes things like update hooks irrelevant.)

All current development is happening with github (repositories and issues) but history was not migrated when we moved active development from svn to git and from trac to github issues.

On Feb 10, 2017 09:21, "Jeff McKenna" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I'm not understanding your comment:  are you meaning to tell strk that GeoMOOSE needs the Trac instance?  If yes, then please let him know (that ticket is in regards to a 'hook', so he needs to know if you need that still).  Sorry, must be my Friday brain :)

-jeff



On 2017-02-10 11:07 AM, Jim Klassen wrote:
Replied Geomoose has history in trac/svn but current development is on
github so we don't expect trac/svn to change.


On 02/10/2017 07:45 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
Sandro ("strk") needs feedback from the GeoMOOSE PSC, on the GeoMOOSE
trac instance: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1873  You might
just update that ticket with "We don't need the Trac instance anymore,
OK to remove the GeoMOOSE trac instance fully" or whatever you feel.
Thanks!

-jeff




_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc



--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
Loading...